The High Court disposed of an anticipatory bail application by directing the trial court to decide the applicant's bail application expeditiously, relying on the Supreme Court judgment in Satender Kumar Antil.
Application disposed of; applicant directed to move bail application before the court below for expedient hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:231012
Court No. - 71
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 12413 of 2023
Applicant :- Sangram Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Amit Rana,Anoop Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.
Order Date :- 6.12.2023 RavindraKSingh
Digitally signed by :- RAVINDRA KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application should be disposed of by directing the court below to decide the bail application expeditiously under the Satender Kumar Antil judgment.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and anotherReferred¶9
2021 SCC Online SC 922 · Who else cites this
Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & AnotherFollowed¶10
Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 5191 of 2021
Sangram Singh
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
