Vinay Prakash Yadav v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
No. - 2023:AHC:232040 Court No. - 71 Case :-…
No. - 2023:AHC:232040 Court No. - 71 Case :-…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:232040
Court No. - 71
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 10142 of 2023
Applicant :- Vinay Prakash Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Prabal Pratap,Kamal Krishna Roy Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Bhawani Prasad Shukla
Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.
Sri Ramesh Kumar, Advocate holding brief of Sri Kamal Krishna Roy, learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the present anticipatory bail application has become infructuous as the applicant has been arrested in the present case.
Accordingly, the present anticipatory bail application is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 7.12.2023 Krishna*
Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Vinay Prakash Yadav
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
Krishna Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court