Rahul v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court disposed of this anticipatory bail application by directing the applicant to file a proper application before the lower court within 15 days. No coercive action shall be taken during this period.
What did the court decide?
Direction to file appropriate application in lower court within 15 days; no coercive action for 15 days.
What the court decided
Court No. - 85
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 13516 of 2022
Applicant :- Rahul Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Anand Pati Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mrs. Jyotsna Sharma,J.
- Heard Sri Anand Pati Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri O.P. Mishra, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the papers on record.
- This application has been moved on behalf of the applicant- Rahul seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No.80 of 2018, under Sections 352, 323, 436, 427,506 and 308 I.P.C., P.S. Aurangabad, District Bulandshahr.
- At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant prays not to press this anticipatory bail application with further prayer to grant him relief in the light of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and Another, (2021) 10 SCC 773.
- This anticipatory bail application is disposed of with a direction to file appropriate application before the court below within 15 days from today, which shall be decided strictly according to law.
- For the period of 15 days from today or till the time of appearance of the applicant before the court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant in the above case.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application should be disposed of by directing the applicant to file an appropriate application before the court below within 15 days.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Rahul
Coram
Jyotsna Sharma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/13516/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court