Allowed

Dileep Kumar and 3 Others v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC12 May 2023ABAIL/13312/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The single judge court disposed of the anticipatory bail application directing the applicants to surrender within one month, while remembering the liberty to file a regular bail application in accordance with Supreme Court guidelines in Satender Kumar Antil.

What did the court decide?

Applicants directed to surrender within one month; liberty granted to file regular bail application as per Satender Kumar Antil guidelines.

Dileep Kumar and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:103771

¶2

Court No. - 83

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 13312 of 2022

¶4

Applicant :- Dileep Kumar And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Akhilesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

¶6

List has been revised.

¶7

Heard Sri Akhilesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicants as well as Sri Nitin Kesarwani, learned A.G.A. for the State and also perused the record.

¶8

The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed for protection in regard to FIR/Case Crime No. 58 of 1994, under Sections 420, 467, 379 of I.P.C., P.S.- Ekdil, District- Etawah.

¶9

After arguing for some time, applicants' counsel submits that the present application for anticipatory bail may be disposed of with liberty to file a regular bail application which may be decided keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another , reported in 2022 SCC Online SC 825 .

¶10

Learned counsel for the informant as well as learned AGA have no objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the applicants.

¶11

After hearing learned counsel for the parties, no case is made out for interference u/s 438 Cr.P.C.. The present anticipatory bail application is disposed of with the direction that the applicants shall surrender before the concerned court below within one month from today and in case, a regular bail application is filed, the same be decided in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra) .

¶12

For the period of one month from today or till the time of surrender of the applicants before the concerned court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants, namely, Dileep Kumar, Chandrashekhar, Ramswarup and Surjeet Singh , in the above case.

¶13

(Justice Krishan Pahal)

¶14

Order Date :- 12.5.2023 Siddhant

¶15

Digitally signed by :- SIDDHANT SAHU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Dileep Kumar and 3 Others v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dileep Kumar and 3 Others v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashok Kushwaha Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Shivkunwar Rai Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Kamal Tyagi and Another Vs State of U.P.

Asad @ Mohd. Arshad Alam Vs State of U.P and 2 Others

Minakshi Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Mangala Prasad Patel @ Mangala Patel Vs State of U.P.