On the application of Minakshi seeking anticipatory bail, her counsel stated that the prayer was not pressed. The court dismissed the application on the ground that it was not pressed.
None, as the application was dismissed for not being pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:102848
Court No. - 83
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1015 of 2023
Applicant :- Minakshi Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Anshul Kumar Singhal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
(Justice Krishan Pahal)
Order Date :- 12.5.2023 Shalini
Digitally signed by :- SHALINI JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application pressed by the applicant should be allowed or dismissed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Minakshi
Krishan Pahal
Shalini
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
