The Allahabad High Court rejected an application for anticipatory bail filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. The court held that the applicant had a long unexplained criminal history and was not a stranger to the underlying civil litigation, constituting a fit case for bail.
The anticipatory bail application was rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:101598
Court No. - 83
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 4520 of 2023
Applicant :- Kamal Tyagi And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Shiv Sagar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Dinesh Kumar Sharma
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
the appellate court, as such he has added the present criminal colour to the civil litigation between the parties. Several other submissions have been made on behalf of the applicants to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against them. The circumstances which, as per counsel, led to the false implication of the applicants have also been touched upon at length.
(Krishan Pahal, J.)
Order Date :- 11.5.2023 Ravi Kant
Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicants have a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail in a serial crime involving serious offenses and sexual harassment allegations?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Kamal Tyagi
State of U.P.
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
