Anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. was rejected by the Allahabad High Court due to the existence of injured persons and cross-versions in the case.
The anticipatory bail application was rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:231749
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 13091 of 2023
Applicant :- Om Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Yashpal Yadav,Sunil Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
apprehension of his arrest. There are no criminal antecedents of the applicant. There being cross version, the applicant is entitled for anticipatory bail.
Order Date :- 07.12.2023 Ravi Kant
(Krishan Pahal, J.)
Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to anticipatory bail given the cross-versions and injuries in the case.
Whether the arguments regarding regular bail can be agitated at the stage of anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Shivam vs. State of U.P. and Another, 2021 SCC OnLine All 264Referred¶12
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Om Singh
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
