Allowed

Ajay v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC6 Dec 2023BAIL/45807/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge allowed a bail application filed under the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, without expressing an opinion on merits, directing the applicant to execute a bond with two sureties and abide by specific conditions regarding witness tampering and future criminal activity.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties in a like amount, with conditions against tampering with witnesses, cooperating in trial, and refraining from criminal activity.

Ajay Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:230677

¶2

Court No. - 72

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 45807 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Ajay Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Mukul Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

¶6

List has been revised.

¶7

Heard Sri Mukul Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri V.K.S. Parmar, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record.

¶8

By means of the present bail application, the applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.209 of 2022, under Section 2/3 of U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station- Atrauli, District- Aligarh, during the pendency of trial.

¶9

It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the prosecution under the Gangsters Act have been launched against the applicant on the basis of four criminal cases shown in the gang chart in which he has already been enlarged on bail by the court concerned. The details of criminal cases have been mentioned in paragraph 7 to the affidavit accompanying the bail application. He has been falsely implicated in the present case due to police rivalry. He is not the member of any gang. Learned counsel has further stated that the criminal history assigned to the applicant stands explained. The applicant is languishing in jail since 25.03.2022. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.

¶10

On the other hand, learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.

¶11

Without expressing any opinion on the merits, the bail application is allowed. Let the applicant- Ajay, involved in aforementioned case be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :-

¶12

(i). The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by

¶13

intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial. (ii). The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶14

(iii). The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶15

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

¶16

Order Date :- 06.12.2023

¶17

Ravi Kant

¶18

(Krishan Pahal, J.)

¶19

Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ajay v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajay v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Geeta Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Satyaram Vs State of U.P.

Amir Vs State of U.P.

Shabeena and 2 Others Vs State of U.P.

Atul Kumar Jain Vs State of U.P. and Another

Uzma Bano Vs State of U.P. and Another