Disposed

Sandeep Kumar Tripathi v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC7 Dec 2023ABAIL/12546/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. instructing the applicant to file a regular bail application within one month. No coercive action is allowed during this period.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail disposed with a direction to file a regular bail application within one month; no coercive action for the interim period.

Sandeep Kumar Tripathi Vs State of U.P. — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:232219

¶2

Court No. - 72

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 12546 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Sandeep Kumar Tripathi Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sanjay Vikram Singh,Rakesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Anita Singh,Dinesh Kumar Misra

¶5

Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

¶6

List has been revised.

¶7

Supplementary affidavit filed by learned counsel for the applicant is taken on record.

¶8

Heard Sri Sanjay Vikram Singh, learned counsel for applicant, Ms. Anita Singh, learned counsel for the informant as well as Sri Rajendra Prasad, learned Additional Government Advocate for State.

¶9

The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed for protection in regard to Case Crime No.96 of 2022, under Sections 419, 420, 406, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station- Kotwali, District- Jaunpur.

¶10

After arguing for some time, applicant's counsel submits that the present application for anticipatory bail may be disposed of with a direction to file a regular bail application which may be decided keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in 2022 SCC OnLine SC 825 .

¶11

Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer of learned counsel for the applicant.

¶12

After hearing learned counsel for the parties, no case is made out for interference U/s 438 Cr.P.C. The present anticipatory bail application is disposed of with a direction that the applicant shall surrender before the concerned court below within one month from today and in case a regular bail application is filed, the same be decided in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra) .

¶13

For the period of one month from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the concerned court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant, in the above case.

¶14

Order Date :- 7.12.2023

¶15

Vikas

¶16

[Krishan Pahal, J.]

¶17

Digitally signed by :- VIKAS VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Sandeep Kumar Tripathi v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sandeep Kumar Tripathi v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shabeena and 2 Others Vs State of U.P.

Ajay Vs State of U.P.

Atul Kumar Jain Vs State of U.P. and Another

Om Singh Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Sanjiv Vs State of U.P.

Amit Vs State of U.P. and Another