The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. The court found no good ground to grant bail given the serious injuries sustained by the informant and rejected the plea of false implication.
The anticipatory bail application is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 85
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 12480 of 2022
Applicant :- Salim And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- U.C. Chaturvedi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Mohd. Nasim Ahmad
Hon'ble Mrs. Jyotsna Sharma,J.
of the case, I do not find any good ground to grant anticipatory bail.
09. It is made clear that observations made in rejecting anticipatory bail to the applicant shall not in any way affect the learned trial Judge in forming his independent opinion at any stage of the case based on material before him.
Order Date :- 17.1.2023 Gaurav
Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted under Section 438 Cr.P.C. given the nature of the FIR involving serious injuries.
Whether the FIR was filed with mala fide intent to humiliate the applicants.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Salim And 3 Others
Jyotsna Sharma
Gaurav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
