The court dismissed an unpressed anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C., granting no coercive action for 15 days and allowing a fresh application within that period.
No coercive action for 15 days; liberty to file appropriate application within 15 days.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 85
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 11599 of 2022
Applicant :- Amravati Opposite Party :- State Of U.P And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Saurabh Kesarwani Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mrs. Jyotsna Sharma,J.
Order Date :- 13.1.2023 Saif
Digitally signed by :- SHAIKH SAIF ABDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application, which is not pressed with further prayers in light of Satender Kumar Antil, should be dismissed.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and AnotherReferred¶7
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and Another, (2021) 10 SCC 773 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Amravati
State Of U.P
Jyotsna Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
