In Criminal Misc. Application No. 11649 of 2022, the Allahabad High Court dismissed an anticipatory bail application filed by Naiyyar Abbas as not pressed, relying on the principle in Satender Kumar Antil vs. CBI.
No coercive action during 15 days; liberty to file application before court below.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 85
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 11649 of 2022
Applicant :- Naiyyar Abbas Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Manohar Kashyap Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Kashi Nath Singh Yadav
Hon'ble Mrs. Jyotsna Sharma,J.
Order Date :- 13.1.2023 Saif
Digitally signed by :- SHAIKH SAIF ABDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application should be dismissed as not pressed considering the Antil judgment.
Whether coercive action shall be taken against the applicant for a period of 15 days.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and AnotherReferred¶3
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and Another, (2021) 10 SCC 773 · Who else cites this
Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of InvestigationReferred¶4
Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation (supra)
Naiyyar Abbas
Jyotsna Sharma
Shaikh Saif Abdin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
