The single judge dismissed an anticipatory bail application filed by Savitri in default of her appearance, noting a prior absence and apparent lack of interest. No legal reasoning was provided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 85
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 12342 of 2022
Applicant :- Savitri Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Dharmendra Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mrs. Jyotsna Sharma,J.
Case called out in the revised list. None responds for the applicant. Learned AGA for the State is present.
Even none appeared on behalf of the applicant on previous date i.e., 03.02.2023 when the matter was taken up for hearing.
It appears that the applicant has lost interest for some reason in this case. As none is present to press this anticipatory bail application, the same is dismissed in default.
Order Date :- 7.2.2023 #Vikram/-S
Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application should be allowed given the absence of the applicant.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Savitri
State of U.P.
Jyotsna Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
