Dismissed
Amit Kumar v. State of U.P. and Another
Allahabad HCABAIL/2503/2022
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL…
What the court decided
AI extract
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 85
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 2503 of 2022
Applicant :- Amit Kumar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Pranshu Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Mukesh Kumar
Hon'ble Mrs. Jyotsna Sharma,J.
None responds for the applicant despite revised call. However, Sri Mukesh Kumar, learned counsel for the informant/opposite party no.2 and learned A.G.A. for the State are present.
It may be noted that on previous two occasions, none appeared on behalf of the applicant to press this anticipatory bail application.
As today none is present to press this application for anticipatory bail. Hence, it is dismissed for default.
Order Date :- 12.1.2023 Saif
Digitally signed by :- SHAIKH SAIF ABDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Amit Kumar
State Of U.P.
Jyotsna Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court