Fatma Parveen v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Allahabad High Court; Application U/S 482 No. 42614 of 2022; decided 5.4.2023 by Hon'ble Mrs. Sadhna Rani (Thakur), J. Maintenance recovery / execution: Sections 125, 125(3), 126(2) and 83 Cr.P.C.; Execution Case No. 81 of 2020, Fatma Parveen v. Tufail Ahmad, Family Court, Ballia (arising from Original Case No. 402 of 2019); Rs.10,000/- per month maintenance awarded ex-parte on 20.01.2021 w.e.f. 30.07.2019; opposite party no.2 absconded to Qatar/Saudi Arabia for employment; arrest warrant (order-sheet 18.05.2022) held ineffective outside India; S.126(2) application held decided earlier since trial court proceeded under S.125(3); Family Court directed to adopt other coercive measures for recovery expeditiously; application disposed of. Applicant: Fatma Parveen (counsel Krishna Bihari); Opposite Parties: State of U.P. & Anr. (A.G.A.-I Sanjay Singh; G.A.).
What did the court decide?
Direction to the trial court (Principal Judge, Family Court, Ballia) to adopt other coercive measures against opposite party no.2 for recovery of the maintenance amount, as per law, as expeditiously as possible.