Deepankar Pandey v. State of U.P. . and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3675 of…
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3675 of…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 69
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3675 of 2023
Applicant :- Deepankar Pandey Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. . And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Bipin Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.
List revised.
Heard Sri Bipin Kumar Tripathi, learned counsels for the applicant and Sri B.B. Upadhyay, learned counsel for the State and perused the record.
The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant Deepankar Pandey with the prayer to allow the present application and quash the entire proceeding in Case No. 1921 of 2022 'Complaint Case No. 492/2021' (Smt. Shamsi Shakeel Vs. Deepankar Pandey), under Section 138 Negotiable Instrument Act, pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Amorha pursuant to impugned summoning order dated 26.07.2021 as well as impugned order dated 04.06.2022 issuance of non bailable warrant passed by the courts below and with a further prayer to stay the further proceedings in the aforesaid case, during the pendency of the present application.
After arguments at length, learned counsel for the applicant states that the present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. be dismissed as withdrawn as he intends to file a better petition.
Prayer is allowed.
The present application is dismissed as withdrawn.
Certified copies, if any, be returned as per rules.
Order Date :- 17.2.2023 M. ARIF
(Samit Gopal, J.)
Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD ARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Deepankar Pandey
State Of U.P.
Samit Gopal
Mohammad Arif
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court