Disposed
Shahbul Alias Pintoo v. State of U.P. and Another
Allahabad HCA482/2239/2023
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2239 of…
What the court decided
AI extract
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2239 of…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 69 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2239 of 2023 Applicant :- Shahbul Alias Pintoo Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Jahangir Haider Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.
List revised.
Heard Shri Jahangir Haider, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri B.B. Upadhyay, learned counsel for the State and perused the material brought on record.
The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant- Shahbul Alias Pintoo with the prayer to direct the learned Special Judge (E.C. Act) Ghaziabad to consider and decide Special Sessions Trial No. 94 of 2009 (State of U.P. Vs. Pintu @ Shahbul and others) arising out of Case Crime No. 201 of 2009, under Sections 136/138 of Electricity Act and Section 411 I.P.C., Police Station Bhojpur, District Ghaziabad as expeditiously as possible, in accordance with law preferably within time as fixed by this Hon'ble Court.
Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the applicant is the accused in the present case. It is further argued that the trial is lingering on just because of non co-operation of the opposite party no.2 and, as such, appropriate direction be issued for disposal of trial in time bound manner.
Per contra, learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer made in the present matter by arguing that no such specific reasons have been made out for giving any direction for expediting the trial of the case and as such the application be dismissed.
After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and perusing the records, it is evident that there is no specific reason for expediting the same. However, the applicant may file an application for expediting the trial before the court concerned within two weeks from today which may as per its load of work, diary and pendency of cases pass appropriate orders on the same within two weeks.
It is made clear that this Court has not passed any direction for expediting the trial.
The present application is disposed of.
Order Date :- 1.2.2023/AS Rathore
(Samit Gopal,J.)
Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK SINGH RATHOR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shahbul Alias Pintoo
State of U.P.
Another
Samit Gopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court