Verma Singh and Another v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2237 of…
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2237 of…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 69
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2237 of 2023
Applicant :- Verma Singh And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Saurabh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.
List revised.
Sri Saurabh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri B.B. Upadhyay, learned counsel for the State are present.
The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants- Verma Singh and Awdhesh Singh @ Chhanu Singh with the prayer to stay the operation of order dated 27.09.2022 passed by Special Judge S.C. / S.T. Act IInd Addl. Session Judge, Farrukhabad in Criminal Revision No. 96 / 2009 (Verma Singh vs. State of U.P.) as well as the order dated 03..05.2019 passed by the Additional Deputy District Magistrate, Sadar, Farrukhabad in Case No. 01 of 2016 under Section 145 Cr.P.C. (Omlata vs. Verma Singh) Police Station Kamalganj, District Farrukhabad with a further prayer to stay the further proceedings of the said case.
After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicants states that the present application be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a better petition.
As prayed, the present the present application U/S 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed as withdrawn.
Certified copies, if any, be returned to as per rules.
Order Date :- 1.2.2023 AS Rathore
(Samit Gopal,J.)
Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK SINGH RATHOR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Verma Singh
Awdhesh Singh @ Chhanu Singh
State Of U.P.
Samit Gopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court