Disposed

Om Prakash v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC27 Apr 2023A482/15088/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single Judge disposed of an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. by allowing the applicant to forego quashing prayers. The court directed the High Court to direct the lower court to consider the applicant's bail application under Satender Kumar Antil rules.

What did the court decide?

Application disposed of by directing the applicant to seek bail before the lower court in accordance with Satender Kumar Antil.

Om Prakash Vs State of U.P. and Another — Quashing and FIR | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Court No. - 65 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 15088 of 2023

¶2

Applicant :- Om Prakash Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Syed Ahmed Faizan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶3

Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J.

¶4

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶5

This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant with the prayer to quash the bailable warrant as well as entire criminal proceedings of Complaint Case No. 4601 of 2019 (M/S Asharam and sons Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Om Prakash M/S Shri Nath Kripa Foods Pvt. Ltd.), under Section 406 IPC, P.S. Kotwali, District- Meerut, pending in the court of Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 7, Meerut.

¶6

After some argument, learned counsel for the applicant has made a statement at the bar, on instructions, that he does not want to press other prayers made in the application and states that the applicant is ready to surrender before the court below and seek his bail and that his bail application be considered and disposed of in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in (2021) 10 SCC 773 .

¶7

Learned AGA states that he has no objection to the aforesaid prayer made by the counsel for the applicant for not pressing the other prayers made in the instant application.

¶8

In view of the above, in case the applicant appears before the court below within three weeks from today and applies for bail, his bail application be considered and disposed of in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in (2021) 10 SCC 773 after hearing the parties.

¶9

With the aforesaid observations, this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is finally disposed of.

¶10

Order Date :- 27.4.2023 KU

¶11

Digitally signed by :- KALIM UDDIN SIDDIQUI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Om Prakash v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Om Prakash v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vikash Vs State of U.P. and Another

Gyan Chandra Maurya Vs State of U.P.and Another

Sifa Bano Vs State of U.P.and 6 Others

Manindra Dhama Vs State of U.P. and Another

Shashi Kant Vs State of U.P. and Another

Niranjan Singh and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another