Disposed

Gyan Chandra Maurya v. State of U.P.and Another

Allahabad HC26 Apr 2023A482/12556/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application by accepting the applicant's request to surrender. The court directed that the applicant's bail application be heard and disposed of based on the law laid down in Satender Kumar Antil vs. CBI, requiring appearance within three weeks.

What did the court decide?

Application disposed; Applicant directed to appear within three weeks to seek bail.

Gyan Chandra Maurya Vs State of U.P.and Another — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Court No. - 65 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 12556 of 2023 Applicant :- Gyan Chandra Maurya Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Brijesh Kumar Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J.

¶2

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶3

This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant with the prayer to quash the charge sheet dated 28.8.2022 and cognizance alongwith summoning order dated 17.10.2022 as well as further proceedings of Case No. 1126 of 2022 (State Vs. Gyan Chandra Maurya) arising out of Case Crime No. 0047 of 2022, under Sections 323, 506, 354-B IPC, P.S. Singramau, District- Jaunpur, pending in the Court of Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate-III, Court No. 14, Jaunpur.

¶4

After some argument, learned counsel for the applicant has made a statement at the bar, on instructions, that he does not want to press other prayers made in the application and states that the applicant is ready to surrender before the court below and seek his bail and that his bail application be considered and disposed of in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in (2021) 10 SCC 773 .

¶5

Learned AGA states that he has no objection to the aforesaid prayer made by the counsel for the applicant for not pressing the other prayers made in the instant application.

¶6

In view of the above, in case the applicant appears before the court below within three weeks from today and applies for bail, his bail application be considered and disposed of in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in (2021) 10 SCC 773 after hearing the parties.

¶7

With the aforesaid observations, this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is finally disposed of.

¶8

Order Date :- 26.4.2023

¶9

¶10

Digitally signed by :- KALIM UDDIN SIDDIQUI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Gyan Chandra Maurya v. State of U.P.and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gyan Chandra Maurya v. State of U.P.and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sundar Lal and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Shailesh Pathak Vs State of U.P. and Another

Amjad and 8 Others Vs State of U.P. and Anothers

Vikash Vs State of U.P. and Another

Sifa Bano Vs State of U.P.and 6 Others

Brijesh Singh Pal Vs State of U.P. and Anothers