In a matter under Article 227 regarding a property dispute and request for temporary injunction, the petitioner failed to appear. The High Court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution without engaging with the underlying relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:151402
Court No. - 1
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6380 of 2023
Petitioner :- Ishrat Ali Respondent :- Abid Ali And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mahtab Alam
Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J.
"(i) to allow this petition, call for the records and modify the order dated 22.12.2022 passed by Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) Court No.1, Varanasi in O.s. No. 4317/2022 ( Ishrat Ali Versus Abid Ali and others directing the parties to maintain status quo in respect of the property in suit during the pendency of the suit or application 6C for temporary injunction exercising its superintendence power under Article 227 of the Constitution of India (Annexure No.3 to this petition.
(ii) to pass the order directing the court below to decide the application for temporary injunction 6 C (Annexure No. 2 to this petition) expeditiously."
Order Date :- 28.7.2023 sfa/
(Jayant Banerji, J.)
Digitally signed by :- SYED FAHEEM AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ishrat Ali
Abid Ali
Jayant Banerji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
