Petitioner sought to set aside lower court orders via Article 226 petition. No one appeared for the petitioner. The petition was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:151407
Court No. - 1
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6368 of 2023
Petitioner :- Ali Hasan Respondent :- Sitaram Yadav And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Adeel Ahmad Khan Counsel for Respondent :- Pramod Kumar Pandey
Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J.
"It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to allow this petition and set aside the impugned order dated 28.4.2023, passed by District Judge, Maharajganj in Misc. Civil Appeal No. 41 of 2022 (Ali Hasan Versus Sitaram and others) and judgment and order dated 29.11.2021 passed by Civil Judge ( Junior Division), Maharajganj in Original Suit No. 817 of 2020 (Ali Hasan Versus Sitaram and others) (Annexure No.1 and 2 to this petition)."
Order Date :- 28.7.2023 sfa/
(Jayant Banerji, J.)
Digitally signed by :- SYED FAHEEM AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Ali Hasan
Sitaram Yadav
And 3 Others
Jayant Banerji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
