The High Court dismissed the writ petition after the petitioner sought to withdraw it to seek remedy in another forum or court.
Petition disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to seek remedy before any other Forum/Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 2
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1900 of 2023
Petitioner :- Saiyad Shakir Ali Alias Mizzan Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Distt. Magistrate, Gonda And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Deepak Kumar Pandey,Anjali Divedi,Anupam Bajpai
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya,J. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned State Counsel.
After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner states that it will be appropriate to withdraw this writ petition to seek remedy on behalf of the petitioner before any other Forum/Court.
Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty to the petitioner.
( Subhash Vidyarthi, J. ) ( Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya, J. )
Order Date :- 3.3.2023 A.Nigam
Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Saiyad Shakir Ali Alias Mizzan
State Of U.P.
Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
