07.10.2022. Thereafter he managed the expenses of the counsel and preferred the revision 18.10.2022. It is further submitted that revisionist moved an application under section 156(3) Cr.P.C. dated 03.09.2020 in the court of Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division)/FTC, Sitapur, which was converted into complaint case by the concerned court. The complainant appeared in the court and the statement of complaint under section 200 Cr.P.C. were recorded. The statement of witnesses Aman and Sabir were recorded under section 202 Cr.P.C. Learned trial court summoned the opposite party nos.2 to 10 only under sections 323, 504, 506, IPC, however, from the evidence of witnesses and complainant recorded under sections 202 and 200 Cr.P.C. the offence under section 392 IPC also made out. It is further submitted that Ishtiyak wanted to marry his daughter with Anash, the son of revisionist. As the opposite party nos.2 to 10 are criminal, hence he refused, due to which the opposite party lodged the FIR against the son of revisionist for sexual harassment. It is further submitted that learned trial court did not considered the statements of witnesses and summoned the opposite party nos.2 to 10 only under sections 323, 504, 506, IPC. In the application under section 156(3) Cr.P.C. it is disclosed that Anash son of revisionist has a shop of Electric Binding, who refused to marry the daughter of Ishtiyak, as they are criminals. It is also transpires from the application under section 15(3) Cr.P.C. that opposite party nos.2 to 10 looted Rs.15,000/- cash from the shop of Anash and destroyed the goods of the shop and has beaten the revisionist and his son with fits, kicks, Lathi and Danda. It is also submitted that Anash has internal injuries. Learned trial court did considered above mentioned facts.
