This is a single-judge original jurisdiction writ proceeding in the Allahabad High Court where the petition failed due to the non-appearance of the petitioner's counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 48
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9393 of 2022
Petitioner :- Omprakash Respondent :- Union Of India And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Indra Bhahadur Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,C.S.C.,Devendra Kumar,Madhu Pal
Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J. Hon'ble Syed Waiz Mian,J.
Case called out. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition.
Shri Devendra Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent no. 6 is present.
Order sheet reveals that learned counsel for the petitioner was not present on earlier occasions also, when the matter was taken up.
Accordingly, petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
Order Date :- 18.7.2022 Deepak/
Digitally signed by DEEPAK KUMAR KUSHWAHA Date: 2022.07.20 09:54:47 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Omprakash
Union Of India
Suneet Kumar
Syed Waiz Mian
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
