The single writer found the writ petition infructuous as the underlying complaint had been withdrawn and disposed of the matter accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 21
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 55068 of 2013
Petitioner :- Dr. Vineet Garg Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Secy. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- S.K. Tyagi,J.J.Munir,Pooja Agarwal,Vishal Mittal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Avanish Mishra,Gulrej Khan,J.H.Khan,Kartikeya Saran,Kasar Zaidi,Naresh Taneja
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J. Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.
Ms. Pooja Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant matter has become infructuous as the complaint in pursuance of which impugned order was passed, stands withdrawn.
Accordingly, the petition is disposed off as infructuous.
Order Date: - 8.7.2022 CS/-
(Dr. Y.K. Srivastava,J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.)
Digitally signed by CHANDAN SINGH Date: 2022.07.11 11:07:08 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Dr. Vineet Garg
State Of U.P. Thru Secy. And 6 Others
Manoj Kumar Gupta
Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
