Dismissal for want of prosecution where the petitioner failed to appear to press the writ petition on the listed date. No substantive disposal of the underlying arguments occurs in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 38
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 47399 of 1999
Petitioner :- Abdul Majid Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- A.P. Srivastava,R.B. Trivedi Counsel for Respondent :- S.C.
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
List revised. None present for the petitioner to press this writ petition. Learned Standing Counsel is present.
Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 26.5.2022 Faraz
Digitally signed by FARAZ AHMAD Date: 2022.05.26 16:24:41 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Abdul Majid
State of U.P.
Saumitra Dayal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
