The court dismissed this writ petition as it had become infructuous due to the efflux of time and the absence of the petitioners to press the matter.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 82
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 4273 of 2022
Petitioner :- Smt. Parul And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Arvind Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Umesh Kumar,J.
Neither counsel for the petitioners appears nor supplementary affidavit annexing therewith copy of the better age proof of the petitioners has been filed.However, learned A.C.S.C.is present.
It appears that by efflux of time either cause of action is no more surviving or for any other reason matter has rendered infructuous and that is why none is present to press this petition.
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 19.4.2022
MN/-
Digitally signed by MAHENDRA NATH Date: 2022.04.20 13:32:33 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parul
Another
State Of U.P.
3 Others
Umesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
