A criminal miscellaneous writ petition was dismissed because none of the parties appeared to press it and the cause of action had effluxed.
The petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 82
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11033 of 2007
Petitioner :- Ishtiaq Ahmed Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Prashant K. Lal,A. Chaturvedi Counsel for Respondent :- Govt. Advocate,Mohd. Yunis Khan,Z.A. Siddiqui
Hon'ble Umesh Kumar,J.
None appears except learned A.G.A.
The matter pertains to the year 2007. It appears that by efflux of time either cause of action is no more surviving or for any other reason matter has rendered infructuous and that is why none is present to press this petition.
In view of the above, this petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 19.4.2022 Fhd
Digitally signed by FAHAD NIYAZ Date: 2022.04.20 16:20:21 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Ishtiaq Ahmed
State of U.P.
Umesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
