The High Court, Allahabad, on the basis that no petitioner appeared and the cause of action may have effluxed, treated the writ petition as infructuous and dismissed it. No substantive legal propositions were laid down.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 82
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 509 of 2022
Petitioner :- Raj Kumari And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Virendra Kumar Srivastava,Rajesh Kumar Srivastava
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Umesh Kumar,J.
None appears except learned A.S.C.
It appears that by efflux of time either cause of action is no more surviving or for any other reason matter has rendered infructuous and that is why none is present to press this petition.
In view of the above, treating this petition to be infructuous, it is dismissed.
Order Date :- 18.4.2022 Fhd
Digitally signed by FAHAD NIYAZ Date: 2022.04.19 10:09:26 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Raj Kumari
State Of U.P.
Umesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
