Reeta and Another v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
This brief order references the detailed reasons available in a separate judgment (Writ-C No.14113 of 2017) and does not contain independent reasoning or operative text.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Chief Justice's Court Serial No.301
**HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD *****
WRIT - C No. - 34494 of 2019
Reeta and another .....Petitioners
Through :-Mr. Pankaj Dubey, Advocate
v/s
State of U.P. and others
.....Respondents
Through :-Mr. Vineet Pandey, Chief Standing Counsel with Mr. A.K. Goyal, Mr. Suresh Singh and Mr. Ramanand Pandey, Additional Chief Standing Counsels, Mr. G.C. Saxena and Mr. Jagdish Pathak, Standing Counsels, Ms. Meenakshi Singh, Mr. Ankit Gaur and Mr. Ajay Prakash Paul, State Law Officers
Ms. Anjali Upadhya, Advocate for respondentGreater Noida
CORAM :HON'BLE RAJESH BINDAL, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, JUDGE
ORDER
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Reeta and another
- respondent
State of U.P. and others
Coram
Rajesh Bindal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIC/34494/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court