Sumitra and 22 Others v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Purposeless order referencing a separate detailed order passed in Writ C No.14113 of 2017 for detailed reasons; no independent reasoning or decision provided in this text.
What the court decided
Chief Justice's Court Serial No. 301
**HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD *****
WRIT - C No. - 28648 of 2019
Sumitra and others
.....Petitioners
Through :- Mr. Ganga Dhar Shukla, Advocate
v/s
State of U.P. and others
.....Respondents
Through :- Ms. Meenakshi Singh, Standing Counsel for the State, Ms. Anjali Upadhya and Mr. Ramendra Pratap Singh, Advocates for Greater Noida.
CORAM : HON'BLE RAJESH BINDAL, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, JUDGE
ORDER
For detailed reasons, see separate order passed today in Writ C No.14113 of 2017, titled as Runwell India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. and others.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sumitra and others
- respondent
State of U.P. and others
Coram
Rajesh Bindal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIC/28648/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court