This writ application is disposed of by reference to a separate detailed order passed in Writ C No. 14113 of 2017 (Runwell India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P.).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Chief Justice's Court Serial No. 301
**HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD *****
WRIT - C No. - 28675 of 2019
Jagdish and others
.....Petitioners
Through :- Mr. Ganga Dhar Shukla, Advocate
v/s
State of U.P. and others
.....Respondent
Through :- Ms. Meenakshi Singh, Standing Counsel for the State, Ms. Anjali Upadhya and Mr. Ramendra Pratap Singh, Advocates for Greater Noida.
CORAM : HON'BLE RAJESH BINDAL, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, JUDGE
ORDER
For detailed reasons, see separate order passed today in Writ C No.14113 of 2017, titled as Runwell India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. and others.
(Piyush Agrawal, J.) (Rajesh Bindal, C.J.)
Allahabad 31.05.2022
Rahul Dwivedi/-
Whether the order is speaking : Yes/No Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No
Digitally signed by RAHUL DWIVEDI Date: 2022.06.01 13:43:38 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Jagdish and others
State of U.P. and others
Rajesh Bindal
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
