Disposed

Shiv Prasad v. State of U.P. and 9 Others

Allahabad HC27 Sept 2022WRIC/29432/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition directed the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Bansi, to decide a specific computer case under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, within six months to prevent undue delay caused by adjournments.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Court below to dispose of Case No. 06158 of 2018 within six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.

Shiv Prasad Vs State of U.P. and 9 Others — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 19

¶2

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 29432 of 2022

¶3

Petitioner :- Shiv Prasad Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 9 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ganesh Shanker Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Kumar Gupta

¶4

Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.

¶5

Heard Sri Ashwini Kumar, holding brief of Sri Ganesh Shanker Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Rajesh Kumar Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.

¶6

The present petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent no.3-Sub Divisional Magistrate, Bansi, District Siddharth Nagar to decide the Case No. 06158 of 2018 (Computer Case No. T201817630206158, Shiv Prasad and others vs Arjun and others) under Section 116 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, within a stipulated time period. The petitioner has stated himself to be the plaintiff in the suit.

¶7

Counsel for the petitioner has referred to the order sheet of the case, a copy whereof has been placed on record along with affidavit filed in support of the petition to submit that despite several dates having being fixed, the matter is being adjourned for some reason or the other and the delay in disposal of the case is causing undue hardship to the petitioner.

¶8

Learned Standing Counsel for the State-Respondents has fairly stated that he has no objection, if the proceeding is expedited.

¶9

Having regard to the aforementioned facts and circumstances and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with an observation that the court below would make an endeavor to decide the aforesaid case in accordance with law, expeditiously preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of the instant order, without granting any unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties, provided there is no other legal impediment.

¶10

Order Date :- 27.9.2022 Kirti

¶11

(Dr. Y.K. Srivastava, J)

¶12

Digitally signed by KIRTI SAHU Date: 2022.09.27 16:28:25 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Shiv Prasad v. State of U.P. and 9 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shiv Prasad v. State of U.P. and 9 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rakesh Kumar Pandey Vs State of U.P. and 5 Others

Nirmla Devi Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Smt. Pramila Devi Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Balkuwar Vs State of U.P. and 12 Others

Arjun Yadav Vs State of U.P. and 16 Others

Surya Prakash and Another Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others