Disposed¶10

Mustaqeem Siddiqui v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC29 Sept 2022WRIC/28839/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court; Dr. Y.K. Srivastava, J.; order dated 29.9.2022; WRIT - C No. 28839 of 2022; expeditious disposal of pending revenue case; Section 35 U.P. Revenue Code, 2006; Tehsildar Tehsil Budhanpur District Azamgarh; Case No. 1145 of 2022 (Mustaqeem Siddiqui vs. Shabeeh Fatma); three-month timeline; adjournments; direction to decide case expeditiously; petition disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of with an observation/direction that respondent no. 2 (Tehsildar) endeavour to decide Case No. 1145 of 2022 under Section 35 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 expeditiously, preferably within three months from presentation of a certified copy of the order, subject to the petitioner not seeking unnecessary adjournments and there being no other legal impediment. ¶10

Mustaqeem Siddiqui Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others — Allahabad HC (2022) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Court No. - 19

¶2

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 28839 of 2022

¶3

Petitioner :- Mustaqeem Siddiqui Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Bhawesh Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rameshwar Prasad Shukla

¶4

Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.

¶5

Supplementary afÏdavit filed today, is taken on record.

¶6

Heard Sri Bhawesh Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Shashi Prakash Singh,, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State respondents and Sri Rameshwar Prasad Shukla, learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 4.

¶7

The petitioner claiming himself to be a purchaser has filed the present petition seeking a direction to the Respondent no. 2/Tehsildar, Tehsil Budhanpur, District Azamgarh to decide the Case No. 1145 of 2022, Computerized Case No. T202215060601445, (Mustaqeem Siddiqui vs. Shabeeh Fatma) under Section 35 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 within a stipulated period.

¶8

Counsel for the petitioner has referred to the order sheet of the case, copy whereof has been appended along with the petition and the supplementary afÏdavit, to contend that although various dates are being fixed for hearing but for some reason or the other the matter is being adjourned and the delay in disposal of the said case is causing undue hardship to the petitioner. Accordingly, a prayer is made to expedite the proceedings.

¶9

Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Staterespondents has no objection to the prayer so made.

¶10

In view of the aforementioned facts and circumstances, the present petition is disposed of with an observation that in case the petitioner appears before the respondent no. 2 and does not seek any unnecessary adjournment it is expected that the respondent no. 2 would make an endeavour to decide the aforesaid case in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order, provided there is no other legal impediment.

¶11

Order Date : - 29.9.2022 Puspendra

¶12

(Dr. Y.K. Srivastava, J.)

¶13

Digitally signed by PUSPENDRA NARAYAN SINGH Date: 2022.09.29 18:27:00 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Mustaqeem Siddiqui v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mustaqeem Siddiqui v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dinesh Vs State of U P and Another

Santosh Kumar Pankaj and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and 8 Others

Prabhawati @ Prabha and Another Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Kunta Devi Vs the Tahsildar Tahsil Handia and 3 Others

Barkhu Yadav Vs State of U.P. and 5 Others

Mohammad Khalid Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others