Disposed

Kunta Devi v. the Tahsildar Tahsil Handia and 3 Others

Allahabad HC29 Sept 2022WRIC/26219/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a Writ Petition, the High Court directed the Revenue Tribunal to dispose of the underlying matter under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 expeditiously within three months, ensuring no unnecessary adjournments were granted, without expressing an opinion on merits.

What did the court decide?

The court below shall decide the case expeditiously within three months from the date of the order without unnecessary adjournments.

Kunta Devi Vs the Tahsildar Tahsil Handia… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 19

¶2

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 26219 of 2022

¶3

Petitioner :- Kunta Devi Respondent :- The Tahsildar Tahsil Handia And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Jai Singh Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶4

Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.

¶5

On an oral prayer made, counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the prayer clause of the petition.

¶6

Heard Sri Ram Kishun Mishra, holding brief of Sri Jai Singh Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Abhishek Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the State-Respondents.

¶7

The present petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent no.2Naib Tahsildar, Pratappur, Tahsil Handia, District Prayagraj to decide the Case No. 367/1411 (Computerized Case No. T2021020307145, Kunta Devi vs. Hriday Narayan) filed under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 within a stipulated time period.

¶8

Counsel for the petitioner has referred to the order sheet of the case, a copy whereof has been placed on record along with affidavit filed in support of the petition to submit that despite several dates having being fixed, the matter is being adjourned for some reason or the other and the delay in disposal of the case is causing undue hardship to the petitioner.

¶9

Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-Respondents has fairly stated that he has no objection, if the proceeding is expedited.

¶10

Having regard to the aforementioned facts and circumstances and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with an observation that the court below would make an endeavor to decide the aforesaid case in accordance with law, expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of the instant order, without granting any unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties, provided there is no other legal impediment.

¶11

Order Date :- 29.9.2022 Kirti

¶12

(Dr. Y.K. Srivastava, J)

¶13

Digitally signed by KIRTI SAHU Date: 2022.09.29 18:13:25 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Kunta Devi v. the Tahsildar Tahsil Handia and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kunta Devi v. the Tahsildar Tahsil Handia and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dinesh Vs State of U P and Another

Santosh Kumar Pankaj and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and 8 Others

Prabhawati @ Prabha and Another Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Barkhu Yadav Vs State of U.P. and 5 Others

Mohammad Khalid Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Mustaqeem Siddiqui Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others