The Single Bench allowed the withdrawal application filed by the petitioner, Hariram. The writ petition challenging acquisition was dismissed as withdrawn, discharged any interim orders, and signed on 9.11.2022 by Registered Assistant Judge Himanshu.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; withdrawal application allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 21585 of 2019 Petitioner :- Hariram Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pankaj Kumar Govil Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Suresh Singh
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.
Order on Withdrawal Application No.05 of 2022:-
Sri Suresh Singh learned counsel for the respondent No.4 is present.
Sri Pankaj Govil learned counsel for the petitioner pressed the withdrawal application dated 03.10.2022 supported with the affidavit of father of petitioner with the contention that the petitioner does not want to pursue the writ petition to challenge the acquisition as he is looking forward to receive compensation.
The withdrawal application is allowed.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
Order Date :- 9.11.2022 Himanshu
Digitally signed by HIMANSHU YADAV Date: 2022.11.09 17:07:14 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Hariram
State Of U.P.
3 Others
Sunita Agarwal
Vipin Chandra Dixit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
