Khempal v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner claimed settlement of dispute outside the Court; the single judge held that no cause of action survived and dismissed the writ petition as infructuous.
Petitioner claimed settlement of dispute outside the Court; the single judge held that no cause of action survived and dismissed the writ petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 38
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11736 of 2022
Petitioner :- Khempal Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Kumar Singh Yadav,Divyansh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sanjai Singh
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
Order Date :- 11.5.2022 Abhilash
Digitally signed by ABHILASH SINGH Date: 2022.05.11 15:03:16 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Khempal
State Of U.P.
3 Others
Saumitra Dayal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court