Komal Singh v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner's writ petition was dismissed as infructuous because his fair price shop license had already been restored in a subsequent order dated 11.4.2022.
Petitioner's writ petition was dismissed as infructuous because his fair price shop license had already been restored in a subsequent order dated 11.4.2022.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 38
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7592 of 2022
Petitioner :- Komal Singh Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Om Prakash Chaube,Shravan Kumar Mishra
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
Pursuant to last order, learned Standing Counsel states, the petitioner's fair price shop license has been restored vide order dated 11.4.2022.
In view of the above, the present petition has been rendered infructuous.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 9.5.2022 Prakhar
Digitally signed by PRAKHAR SRIVASTAVA Date: 2022.05.10 11:03:27 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Komal Singh
State of U.P.
Saumitra Dayal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court