This is a composite judgment that refers detailed reasons to a connected writ petition (Writ-C No. 10965 of 2022, Urmila vs. State of U.P.). The present order does not contain independent reasons.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Chief Justice's Court Serial No. 42 (E. Court)
**HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD *****
WRIT - C No. - 10968 of 2022
Jhamman Singh
.....Petitioner
v/s
State of U.P. and others
.....Respondents
Through :-Mr. Rajeev Singh, Standing Counsel for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and Mr. S.K. Mishra, Advocate for respondent No. 4.
CORAM :HON'BLE RAJESH BINDAL, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, JUDGE
ORDER
For detailed reasons, see separate order passed in Writ-C No. 10965 of 2022, titled as Urmila vs. State of U.P. and others.
(Piyush Agrawal, J.) (Rajesh Bindal, C.J.)
Allahabad 05.05.2022 Shiraz
Whether the order is speaking : Yes/No Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No
Digitally signed by SHIRAZ ALI Date: 2022.05.10 12:40:31 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Jhamman Singh
State of U.P.
Rajesh Bindal
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
