Writ petition against recovery notices dismissed, with liberty for petitioner to avail alternative remedy available under law as petition withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to avail alternative remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Chief Justice's Court Serial No. 36
**HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD *****
WRIT - C No. - 10796 of 2022
M/S Shivam Stone Crusher
.....Petitioner
Through :- Mr. Ved Prakash Ojha, Advocate
v/s
State of U.P. and others .....Respondents Through :- Mr. Alok Kumar Singh, Standing Counsel for respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE RAJESH BINDAL, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, JUDGE
ORDER
(Piyush Agrawal, J.) (Rajesh Bindal, C.J.)
Allahabad 05.05.2022 Shiraz/Shahroz
Whether the order is speaking : Yes/No Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No
Digitally signed by SHIRAZ ALI Date: 2022.05.10 12:24:21 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
M/S Shivam Stone Crusher
State of U.P.
RAJESH BINDAL
PIYUSH AGRAWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
