The High Court disposed of a writ petition as infructuous without recording specific reasons for non-listing on a prior date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 2
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10648 of 2022
Petitioner :- Kajal And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P Through Sec. Home And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohammad Belal,Dhirendra Kumar Srivastava
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J. Hon'ble Ajai Tyagi,J.
Office to explain why the matter was not listed on 5.5.2022 despite the order dated 29.4.2022.
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the matter has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of as become infructuous.
Order Date :- 13.5.2022 LN T
Digitally signed by LALIT TRIPATHI Date: 2022.05.14 13:50:52 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Kajal
State Of U.P
Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker
Ajai Tyagi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
