6. Learned counsel for appellant submitted that a very meagre amount is awarded by learned tribunal. Learned counsel submitted that at the time of accident, the appellant was studying in MBA Course. In this accident, due to grievous injuries in his leg, the leg got shortened and the appellant became 80% disabled as per the medical certificate. Learned counsel submitted that if it would not have happened then the appellant could earn at least Rs.25,000/- per month, after completing his study. But learned tribunal did not consider this fact and assumed his income only Rs.3,000/- per month. The appellant is a student of B.Com (Pass) and was doing MBA from a reputed Institution in Dehradun. It is next submitted by learned counsel that due to shortening of leg, appellant is not able to walk freely and he is not able to do his daily routine works properly and his career prospective are also adversely affected due to disability. Learned counsel did not consider all this facts. It is vehemently submitted that the medical board has issued disability certificate to the tune of 80% but the learned tribunal has considered the disability to the tune of 40% only which is not just and proper. Learned counsel for the appellant has relied on the decisions in (i) Syed Sadiq etc v. Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Co. 2014 LawSuit (SC) 27; (ii) Jithendran v. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. and anr., 2021 0 Supreme (SC) 644; (iii) Pradeep Kumar Tripathi v. Satish Kumar and others, 2017 0 Supreme (All) 1661; and (iv) Gangu Ram v. Rishi Pal & Another, 2018 LawSuit (All) 3762 , to contend that the tribunal has not granted just compensation. The calculation given by the tribunal is
