The petitioner withdrew the presented PIL petition. The court dismissed the petition as not pressed by the counsel without providing a legal exception or precedent analysis.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Chief Justice's Court Serial No.6
**HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD *****
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 545 of 2022
Jayashankarlal .....Petitioner
Through :- Mr. Arvind Prabodh Dubey, Advocate
v/s
State of U.P. and others
.....Respondents
Through :- Ms. Meenakshi Singh, State Law Officer for respondent Nos.1 to 3 and Mr. M.J. Akhatar, Advocate for respondent No.4
CORAM : HON'BLE RAJESH BINDAL, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, JUDGE
ORDER
(Piyush Agrawal, J.) (Rajesh Bindal, C.J.)
Allahabad 25.04.2022 Kuldeep/AHA
Whether the order is speaking : Yes/No Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No
Digitally signed by KULDEEP SINGH Date: 2022.04.29 18:03:43 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Jayashankarlal
State of U.P.
Rajesh Bindal
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
