Withdrawal application filed by the petitioner for withdrawal of withe petiction dated 42448 of 2008 in absence of objection; allowed Writ petition accordingly dismissed.
Withdrawal of the writ petition is allowed; the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 51
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 42448 of 2008
Petitioner :- Daya Ram Respondent :- Dy. Director Of Consolidation Jhansi And Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- D.N. Gupta,V.K. Gupta Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Anuj Kumar,Umesh Chandra Prajapati,Virpratap Singh
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
Civil Misc. Withdrawal Application No. 10 of 2022
Heard Sri Vyas Kumar Prasad, Advocate holding brief of Sri Rajat Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Brijraj Singh, Advocate holding brief of Sri Virpratap Singh, counsel for the respondent nos. 4 and 5.
This withdrawal application has been filed praying for withdrawal of this writ petition by the petitioner in the absence of objection.
The application is allowed.
The writ petition is accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.
Order Date :- 25.11.2022 Rohit
Digitally signed by ROHIT DAS Date: 2022.11.25 17:47:22 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Daya Ram
Dy. Director Of Consolidation Jhansi
Others
Siddharth
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
