The single-judge High Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition containing better particulars and details. The prayer was not opposed.
Withdrawal of the petition allowed with liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7850 of 2022
Petitioner :- Shiv Kumar Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Dinesh Pathak Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Heard Mr. Dinesh Pathak, learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel representing respondents 1 and 2.
After some arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that he be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file fresh giving better particulars and details.
Prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner is not opposed by learned Standing Counsel.
In view of above, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
Order Date :- 30.5.2022 HSM
Digitally signed by HARI SHANKER MISHRA Date: 2022.05.30 18:09:42 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Shiv Kumar
State of U.P.
Another
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
