Liyakat Ali v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a writ petition as infructuous due to the efflux of time. No orders, regulations, or statutes were applied or construed.
The High Court dismissed a writ petition as infructuous due to the efflux of time. No orders, regulations, or statutes were applied or construed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 36
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3689 of 2022
Petitioner :- Liyakat Ali Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shailendra Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.K.S.Parihar,Anil Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
Shri Shailendra Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner states, present petition has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time.
Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 22.12.2022 Prakhar
Digitally signed by :- PRAKHAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Liyakat Ali
State Of U.P.
Saumitra Dayal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court