Held infructuous due to lack of appearance; single-line order dismissing the petition and vacating any interim order.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 37
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 34569 of 2010
Petitioner :- Devendra Pratap And Others Respondent :- Union Of India And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shivam Sharma,S.K. Verma Counsel for Respondent :- Govind Saran,Devendra Tripathi,S.C.,Siddharth Saran,Vivek Singh
Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J.
List has been revised. No one has appeared to press the petition. This writ petition has been listed under the heading of infructuous cases. It appears that either the petitioner has lost interest in the matter or the issue has become infructuous.
In that view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
However, it may be provided that in the event the matter survives, the petitioner would be at liberty to move an application for restoration.
Order Date :- 13.4.2022 Asha
Digitally signed by ASHA Date: 2022.04.19 13:44:46 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Devendra Pratap And Others
Union Of India And Others
Siddhartha Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
