This order dismisses a writ petition as infructuous because no one appeared to press the case. The court noted the listing as infructuous, vacated any interim orders, and allowed restoration if the matter survives. No substantive legal proposition is decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 37
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 14433 of 2018
Petitioner :- Dr. Sweta Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Abhai Kumar Singh,Awadhesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Hemendra Kumar Mishra,Sayyed Kashif Abbas Rizvi
Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J.
List has been revised. No one has appeared to press the petition. This writ petition has been listed under the heading of infructuous cases. It appears that either the petitioner has lost interest in the matter or the issue has become infructuous.
In that view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
However, it may be provided that in the event the matter survives, the petitioner would be at liberty to move an application for restoration.
Order Date :- 13.4.2022
Asha
Digitally signed by ASHA Date: 2022.04.19 13:42:21 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Dr. Sweta Singh
State Of U.P.
Siddhartha Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
