Writ petition alleging grievance before University was dismissed as infructuous because the petitioner stated the issue was redressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 32
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2917 of 2022
Petitioner :- Sandhya Sharma Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vimal Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Vivek Kumar Rai
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.1 and Sri Vivek Kumar Rai, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 2 & 3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed by the University.
Therefore, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 20.4.2022 Ruchi
Digitally signed by RUCHI AGRAHARI Date: 2022.04.20 16:30:12 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Sandhya Sharma
State Of U.P.
2nd Respondent
3rd Respondent
Siddharth
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
